I am, B.Medha, MBBS 3rd semester
roll no: 13
I have been given this assignment that I shall evaluate the examinees aptitude for
2) their ability to connect with and engage in shared learning with their peers through peer review feedback.
QUESTION 1
1
NEUROLOGY
roll no 8 , answer no: 1
https://08arshewarpavankumar.blogspot.com/2021/05/a-40-year-old-male-with-complaints-of.html
evolution of symptomology well explained. it was well comprehensable, easy to understand.
2
CARDIOLOGY
roll no 65, answer no: 2
https://65thanmaireddy.blogspot.com/2021/06/medicine-blended-assignment.html
each drug was mentioned and explained in detail about the mechanism of action,in an understandable way.
3
GASTROENTEROLOGY
roll no 88, answer no:2
https://mridultak.blogspot.com/2021/05/medicine-blended-assignment-may-2021.html
efficacy of each drug was mentioned, standard sources were used, and were mentioned in the answer. indications and mechanism of action was also exlained in detail. it was clear and well comprehensible
4
CARDIOLOGY
roll no 88, B, answer no: 1
https://mridultak.blogspot.com/2021/05/medicine-blended-assignment-may-2021.html
all the comorbodities were well explained along with references.the answers were to the point, well presented.
5
NEUROLOGY
roll no 97, case 2A answer 1
http://nandininamani97.blogspot.com/2021/05/general-medicine-case-discussion.html
pictures should have been included for easy understanding, instead of presenting the information in the form of paragraphs, flow charts should have been made or point wise format would have been better, the pathophysiology was explained in detail and the GABA system and glutamate system were explained well.
6
CARDIOLOGY
roll no 97, case 3D answer 3
http://nandininamani97.blogspot.com/2021/05/general-medicine-case-discussion.html
the indications and contraindications were described but reasoning should have been included for each point.
7
PULMONOLOGY
roll no 100, , case A 1st answer
https://nehae-logs.blogspot.com/2021/05/bimonthly-assignment-for-may-2021.html
beautiful flowcharts were included for both timeline and also etiology which made it easy to understand.
8
INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND HEPATOLOGY
roll no 100, case A 1st answer
https://nehae-logs.blogspot.com/2021/05/bimonthly-assignment-for-may-2021.html
detailed explaination was provided along with pictures, the work was commendable.
9
NEPHROLOGY
roll no 105 case B 3rd answer
https://ramyareddy105pebbeti.blogspot.com/2021/05/medicine-monthly-assignment.html
adequate information was given , the answer was well written. it would've been better presented if important words were underlined or highlighted.
10
GASTROENTEROLOGY
roll no 110 case B 1st answer
https://caseopinionsbyrollno110.blogspot.com/2021/05/i-h-ave-been-given-following-cases-to.html?m=1
the presentation was remarkable, flowcharts were included wherever necessary, the answers were upto the mark,to the point, detailed explaination, easy to understand .
QUESTION 2
https://13medhabaswa.blogspot.com/2021/07/general-medicine-e-log.html
QUESTION 3
CVS
https://60shirisha.blogspot.com/2021/06/medicine-case-discussion_14.html?m=1
A 70 year old female presented to casuality with complaints of Distension of abdomen and shortness of breath Grade-3 since 5days
POSITIVES:
- the history of patient was well presented, and well described.
- the investigation were presented in a proper format, with respective subheadings and the pictures of the reports were included
- diagnosis was mentioned
- the thyroid profile of the patient was not included
- appropritate reason for why the patient had developed hyperthyroidism even though she had hypothyroidism for 5 years was not explained
- under the treatment plan, explaination should have been included for each medicine which was administered
QUESTION 4
ABDOMINAL
https://casescape.blogspot.com/2021/06/acute-kidney-injury-secondary-to.html?m=1
A 60yr old female presented to the OPD with chief complaints of pedal edema since 10 days, decreased urine output since 10 days and fever since 10 days.
POSITIVES:
- personal history was well presented
- both general and systemic examination details were given properly, with appropriate side heading and bullet points
- investigations were clearly mentioned, with pictures of the reports and the dates on which the investigation were done
- the treatment plan was well described with the dates on which drugs were administered
- presentation was to the point, easily comprehendable.
- the patient's history should have been presented in a better way by including bullet points
- in the treatment plan, reasoning should have been given for why the particular drug was administered
Comments
Post a Comment